As yesterday afternoon was my first both Pint-free and feeling decent time in a while, I decided to take the plunge and dye Carrie’s roving. Those of you who have been reading my twattle for any period of time might remember I held a when-are-Charlotte’s-lamb(s)-going-to-be-born contest. Carrie won, Easter Sunday, boy/girl twins. When I emailed her with her choices of prize, she chose dyed roving and I agreed.
The only problem (at the time) with that all my white fiber was at two different mills, Wooly Knob and Pufpaff’s Fiber Processing. (As a quick aside, for the wooly among you who are interested in having your fiber washed and carded into roving, here is a quick review of these two mills: Wooly Knob does a better, more thorough, and cleaner job but takes forever, as in mid-November to mid-May forever; Suzanne Pufpaff does a quick and clean job, as in a one month turnaround including shipping time, but she left much of the vegetal matter behind for me to pick out as I spin.) I received both batches within days of each other and was ready to dye.
As each day passed, either my body or my responsibilities to a Pint-sized farmer prevented me from doing so but, as I have already said, yesterday the magic opportunity arrived. Now, being all crunchy Earth mother-like and preferring the wool’s natural colorations, I had only dyed fiber twice, first during a very misguided let’s-dye-fiber-in-the-washing-machine attempt (I used to do this with Rit dye and fabric and it worked just fine) which resulted in a felted flamingo pink yarn which still sits in my stash unused (I was going for deep red) and second while in Taos, NM at their Fiber Festival in a space dyeing workshop. This turned out well. I had a teacher; we painted the dye on cold vinegar water-soaked yarn and steamed it to set the dye. Hey, I can do this!
Yesterday, instead of using the method that I had completed successfully, I had to make things difficult as I am wont to do. Because it was the author’s favorite method of dyeing and promised watercolor-like results, I decided to try the hot pour method featured in the Twisted Sisters Sock Workbook. Basically, it involves pre-soaking the roving in room temperature water until it is saturated, adding vinegar water to an enamel pan (no aluminum), adding the roving, and bringing it slowly up to a simmer at 190°. Add the dyes of choice, one at a time from lighter to darker until they exhaust or in other words the water runs clear and then add another. It seemed simple enough.
I weighed the required 4 ounces of Carmela’s roving necessary for knitting a pair of sport-weight socks, soaked it and simultaneously boiled water to reconstitute the powdered dyes. Atypical for me, I used chemical dyes; I don’t have time to research the necessary ingredients, must less gather them to create natural dyes.
Here you see the Lanaset/Sabraset dyes in reused jars (I had to get a little crunch in) plus the first color ready to go into the dye bath. Although it looks orange, it is one part yellow dye and two parts water. I was going for a pale yellow to fit in with my concept of a sunny day at the beach. Carrie wanted something along these lines and I aim to please.
This is when I began to stress out a bit and stopped taking photos due to my massive tendencies toward uncoordination. I like my camera and do not want to drop it into a simmering pot of wool. When the used-to-be-a-candy thermometer hit 190, I added a stripe of pale yellow down the center left. In a very short time, the water looked clear to me; I then mixed and added a slightly less pale blue (1 part water, 1 part blue). This was my first mistake; I’ll tell you later. Things started to look a bit green which I wanted at the transition points but not all around. Maybe that yellow dye hadn’t exhausted after all. Also, I noticed the temperature had fallen to 150°; this is bad; this spreads the color everywhere. I saw less and less yellow. I found a handy dandy clear spoon, which I should have used before adding the blue to check the water to make sure it was clear and not pale yellow, therefore guaranteeing that the dye was completely absorbed by the fiber. Although it is a weak excuse, it’s hard to gauge the color of water in a black pan.
After at least an hour of obsessively checking the dye pot for proper temperature levels and water color, I finally added the third dye, a straight blue mixed with no additional water. I also added more vinegar due to the length of time it was taking for the dye to exhaust. By now, I knew this was not going to be the bright and sunny roving requested by Carrie but I thought it might be a nice blue/green variegation that I could spin lace weight and knit a stole/wrap out of it. After another couple hours and the addition of even more vinegar, I decided enough was enough and turned off the stove, covered the pot, and, per instructions, let it come to room temperature overnight.
This morning, “dying” to know what I had created, I rinsed and washed and rinsed the roving even before downing my first cup of coffee.
Behold the masterpiece; I think a little over-dyeing is in order, don’t you?
Please learn from my mistakes:
1. Use pH strips to avoid haphazardly adding splashes of vinegar to the water, which needs a pH of 4 for ideal dye absorption. I do not own pH strips; I need to buy some.
2. Use a clear spoon to check that the dye bath is clear before adding the next dye. Do not insert knuckles into dye bath. Ask me how I know.
3. Do not start poking the wool with a skewer. Yellow and blue make green; we all learned this is grade school.
4. Do not try to talk yourself into keeping bright green roving that way to make a St Patrick’s Days shawl.
I could give up, chalk it up to inexperience, and have green mulch in the garden, but today I plan on stubbornly repeating the process. I think I’ll add some blue, navy blue (1 part black, 4 parts blue), and possibly grey and try for a smoky blue green. I will not stir; I will not pass Go; I will not collect $200.